Subject: [harryproa] Re: moulds
From: "proaharry" <proa@iinet.net.au>
Date: 4/2/2006, 9:32 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, "David Howie" <dana-
tenacity@u...> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, wasn't too specific. To build harry 2004. I can see how you
get by with
> quarter or half hulls as everything is symmetrical. By bunk covers
do you mean
> what might be called a deck, what about decks on lw hull.
> Looking like we're close to signing a tenant, would be good to make
a
> commitment before my Bday, 6 weeks and counting.
>
> Cheers
> David
>
> Ps think Harry wouls match this for speed?
> http://www.tennantdesign.co.nz/boatdesigns/35/Wildfire.htm
>
>
G'day,

Bunk covers are the decks, sorry.   Lee hull decks would be built in
the same mould as the sides and bottom, then joined down the middle. 

Happy birthday for 6 weeks.  Hope it all goes well until then.

Re the Wildfire, a Harry would be longer, lighter, less sail area,
similar righting moment, less windage.  Should be quicker in most
conditions, probably close in light air, the cat will clean up
if/when it can fly it's spinnaker unless the harry has a kite.  Harry
has more usable space, double bunks not singles, cheaper to build and
easier to sail.

regards,

rob 





Yahoo! Groups Links