Subject: Re: [harryproa] mast bury
From: "Peter Southwood" <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net>
Date: 1/26/2007, 3:41 AM
To:
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

The short answer is no, but the loads are inversely proportional to the bury. Less bury, higher loads.It is possible to engineer a rig where the mast has no bury at all and is bonded onto a flange mounted on the deck. Something like this was done about 20 years ago by Richard Glanville (here my memory may fail me, so dont quote me on this) If I remember correctly the monohull "Nissan Skyline" had an unstayed rotating wing mast on a stub axle which had a flange attached to the deck by rails and could be moved fore and aft for balance. a lot of carbon rovings were involved, and the flange was a fairly massive piece of structural laminate, but it crossed oceans.
Cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Keck
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:42 PM
Subject: [harryproa] mast bury

On an unstayed rig, is there a rule of thumb on how much bury you need for a given length of mast?
I read on this page:
that "The minimum "immersion" of mast into cabin is about 1 in 7 ie a 35' high mast needs 5' of bury."  Do you really need that much?  What's the bury on elementarry?
Thanks,
Phil



Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar
alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.5/645 - Release Date: 2007/01/22 04:10 PM

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y!7 Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo!7 Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___