Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Omer wing sail |
From: "Jan Iversen" <pow.jiv@gmail.com> |
Date: 3/26/2008, 9:19 AM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Earlier I raised some questions on the use of The Omer Wing Sail on multihulls. I send the same questions to Mr. Ilan Gonen from the co. Mr. Gonen. His answers can be read here under should anybody have the interest:
You cant compare wharram to harryproa. Wharram are a "timeless"
building method.
I own a Tiki21, and it's the perfect rugged tool for exploring the
thight and shallows, in the scandinavian archipelagos..
A harry type proadesign, built on the wharram plywood construction
would be very interesting for the homebuilder.
I agree that the future of kites will be very interesting. I'm into
all sorts of kitesailing, mostly on snow. I would really like to try
an OutLeader on our Tiki..
/Gunnar
--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au , "proadude" <rbmaui@...> wrote:
>
> ...wharram is not the best example of the modern
multihull...harryproa
> is,so is the omer wing sail.With new technology and some positive
> thinking the future should be showing more of the wing sails
> development...and kites as well.Rob's telescoping mast should go
well
> with that...
> Richard
>
> --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au , "gunnar.westholm"
> <gunnar.westholm@> wrote:
> >
> > More on the twin wing Tiki30 PHA
> > http://www.themultihull.com/ wharram2/ bf7.htm
> >
> > Mvh.
> > Gunnar
> >
> >
> > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au , "Jan Iversen" <pow.jiv@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > No dought that it will work wonderful on the multihull, as the
> > function of
> > > the sail is concerned. My worries goes to the unstayed mast and
the
> > somewhat
> > > "flimsy" construction of the soft sail profile. The rigging of
a
> > multihull
> > > has to stand up to much higher stress/forces than the one of a
mono
> > hull, as
> > > the multihull has much higher stabillity. So the question will
be:
> > can this
> > > very interesting rig be used on a cruising multihull
(catamaran),
> > or will
> > > the weight end up being too heavy? There are lots of other
> > attractive
> > > benefits to have with sail, absolutely interesting developement.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > 2008/3/25, proadude <rbmaui@>:
> > > >
> > > > It may work even better on the multihull,since the apparent
> > wind is
> > > > forward most of the time...
> > > > Richard
> > > > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au <harryproa%
> > 40yahoogroups.com.au >, "Jan
> > > > Iversen" <pow.jiv@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Very interesting website!!! How can this be applyed to say
a
> > catamaran?
> > > > > Jan
> > > > >
> > > > > 2008/3/25, proadude <rbmaui@>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > how about this for a change...if we want to complicate
things
> > even
> > > > > > more,but the effect may be pretty positive?!
> > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > www.omerwingsail.com/