Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: OFF LIST
From: "Rob Denney" <harryproa@gmail.com>
Date: 5/14/2008, 9:57 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

Gday,

Wow! Especially the upwind one.  Was the rudder set the same for both?

regards,

Rob

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:36 AM, tsstproa <bitme1234@yahoo.com> wrote:

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, "jjtctaylor" <jtaylor412@...>
wrote:
>
> Todd,

Think the radius should minimize the heavy slap. Have a suggestion
on how much
> flare/radius ?
>
> Regards,
>
> JT

Following model 1/12 scaling of 12' windward hull: under water
beam, Keel 12'' lower chine above keel 12''lower chine width 15''
upper chine above keel 15'' upper chine width 34'' midship sheer
hieght above keel 30'' midships sheer width 44''.

Windward hull waterline 10'' for a 450lb displacement. So puts
bevel height at about 5'' at rest And lifts higher when sailing on
points of sail higher than a broad reach.

Look in photo's sec. nonharry info for more scale model build of
hull.

Todd



__._,_.___
Y!7 Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo!7 Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___