I was imagining only about 5-7 degrees. Depending how close to the edge, it would be another 30 or 40 cm out--- In
harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au, Doug Haines <doha720@... > wrote:
>
> So is it going to be easy enough poling up?
> I wonder about having the mast swinging around out over the water to lwassuming adrift inside freo harboureither side of the bridges?
> rather it stayed closer within esy reachto grab on to and sing around into place over the mast stepwith one hand while letting out the ope line with the other.
> Depends how far out the angle was.
> What was thereccommended angle, what would that be at the mast's centre of gravity?
> Include boom and maybe sails or maybe not sails, but definiteklly boom as you cannot get it on once
mast is stepped.
> if it was only about a foot of hang out from the base hwhen raising might be OK.
> Decide tonight, glassing step in tommorrow.
> This is mainly for racing, especially with a racing pod when you could go way over easily. Not a cruising feature, never had a problemtoo hard to accidently go over.
> Assuming using a plystyrene racing float hat on the mast top for a racing pod race. and try to seal in the mast iopenings, as long as the mast is not taking water
>
> douhg
>
> --- On Tue, 16/6/09, Robert <cateran1949@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Robert <cateran1949@ ...>
> Subject: [harryproa] Re: reverse bows
> To:
harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au> Date: Tuesday, 16 June, 2009,
5:36 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That would really be a beast
>
> For about a 100 grand you could build a 110' Harry but not out of carbon. 33m/16m, 1m wide waterline. 1.5m high bow, 2m off the water at the crossbeams. 10m should be wide enough, but could go to 15m. 35m mast and 200m of sail displacement of 4.5 tonnes sailing with the narrower beam. Would be a little more difficult to put the mast in by yourself and would be difficult to put on the roof racks. Unfortunately bureaucracy gets in the way once over 15m.
> Enough dreaming. I have to mark some assignments so I get work next semester and accumulate enough money to build a 15/10 Harry
>
> --- In harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au, Doug Haines <doha720@ > wrote:
> >
> > what are you doin' looking at those sorts of things?!
> > Luxury Catamarans.
> > Now with that much
carbon and foam, it could be a 110' harry.
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 16/6/09, Robert <cateran1949@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Robert <cateran1949@ ...>
> > Subject: [harryproa] Re: reverse bows
> > To: harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au
> > Date: Tuesday, 16 June, 2009, 1:48 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Have a look at Sodebo. That handled some pretty scary surfing.
> >
> > . I must admit it makes a lot more sense to increase the length by adding a middle section-- In harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au, Doug Haines <doha720@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > beg to differ!
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 16/6/09, Robert <cateran1949@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From:
Robert <cateran1949@ ...>
> > > Subject: [harryproa] reverse bows
> > > To: harryproa@yahoogrou ps.com.au
> > > Date: Tuesday, 16 June, 2009, 10:10 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > check out
http://luxurycatama ran.blogspot. com/2009/ 05/mala-conducta -beautiful- morelli-and. html and
http://gcaptain. com/maritime/ blog/a-viking- ship-redesigned- for-modern- use/ulstein- x-bow-container- ship/
> > >
> > > Also check out the Catana bow. A Harry lee bow does not need the top section
> > >
> >
>
