Subject: [harryproa] Re: Rig questions, again
From: "Rudolf" <rpvdb@freeler.nl>
Date: 1/6/2010, 9:12 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 


Hi Rob,

You're probably right on building time for bare tube, thing is all the add ons. Like the barbs keeping the boom in place , sailtrack (which was also homemade), hounds, padding for the halyards leads and so on.
And everything has to finished to an exeptable level (well, at least most people do ;)).
Remember this is about comparing an easyrig to others. So we're talking about a balestron boom. An una rig boom would be lighter loaded so less material, and definitely much smaller.
With the swing wing all the extra stuff like the wishbones on the mast are lightly loaded. So it't just a matter of laminating a couple of layers of wood around a simple jig.
I suspect the swing wing would be (much) cheaper to build.
The masts on the Tiki 30 are tapered, hollow wood.

regards, Rudolf



--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:

> Rudolph,
> Booms built the way Sol2's lee hull was built will be very quick, especially
> if the table is already set up. An unstayed mast for an easy rig, una rig
> or swing rig will all take about the same time to build, and the bearings
> for a rotating rig are probably less hassle to install than the
> bearings/parells/whatever on the Swingrig. I like the Swingrig idea, but it
> is going to be a lot heavier, and/or more expensive than a conventional rig,
> with more to break. Be great if someone put one on a harry to see how it
> works on a higher performance boat than the Wharram.
>
> Robert,
> Suspect the swing wing mast should be non tapered, or you will have
> jamming/rattling issues.

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___