Subject: [harryproa] Re: Rig questions, again |
From: Mike Crawford |
Date: 1/8/2010, 5:40 PM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Rudolph,
Thanks for the detailed reply. I was actually in the process of
writing an "I posted to soon" post. When I originally looked at the
link you sent, my browser bombed out and didn't load the bottom half of
the page. I wasn't aware of the 2008 and 2009 design upgrades.
The 2009 wishbones do look much better in terms of the red padding
used to keep the wood off the mast. That might be enough to cut down
on clatter and wear if the downhauls are reasonably snug. I'd
definitely want as much padding and as little friction as realistically
possible (given weight and materials limitations)
The shape on the leeward side of the sail with the 2009 double
wishbones is beautiful. I can't think of a nicer shape. Plus, it will
keep that shape without constantly trimming strings and watching
telltales.
As with Gardner, I do worry a bit about the hinge joint if running in
a strong breeze.
I'd feel better with a magical indestructible composite batten that's
light enough to taper into a nice curve on its own, without a hinge,
and tough enough to take the bend produced by a serious gust. That
would allow the wishbone fronts to be made from wood while using the
benefits of composites for the batten.
Is this realistic? I've seen fishing rods that can bend in a 360
degree arc, so my hope is that it would be possible to create such a
batten.
If not, I suppose one could argue that each wishbone is so lightly
loaded that the hinge strength won't matter, and that the double-frame
system is always going to create an ideal shape, whereas a batten will
curve differently in different wind strengths.
But I still like thinking about a system without a hinged joint.
- Mike
Rudolf vd Brug wrote: