Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Predicting performance? |
From: Arto Hakkarainen |
Date: 6/10/2010, 8:00 AM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Todd,
It took some thinking before I got it. Also a bit hard to tell since puffs are not that easy to see on the video. My analysis:
Dyna rig is more sensitive to correct angle to wind than traditional crab claw. Airflow must remain attached to the lee side of the sail to get the best lift. In the beginning dynarig moves slowly so I guess the sail is too hard on the wind and stalled. At the end when it turns upwind dynarig accelerates and starts moving very fast. Based on what you said about wind direction it probably had good wind angle to sail and looked like having a lot of power at the end of the video.
Traditional sail that looked like crab claw is a different animal. Based on the wind tunnel tests by Marchaj it is not sensitive to correct angle to the wind and has best lift coefficient when the flow is not attached any more and the sail is generating vortexes. Also according to the same tests crab claw is not at its best close hauled. In the beginning of the video traditional crab claw moves the boat very fast on a reach and tight sail but less so at the end when the boat turns to wind. It seems like you just proved the Marchaj wind tunnel tests :) At least your two rigs side by side acted in accordance with the results of Marchaj.
Arto
--- On Wed, 6/9/10, tsstproa <bitme1234@yahoo.
|