Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Leeway Prevention |
From: Rick Willoughby |
Date: 8/1/2010, 7:53 PM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Dennis
Hi Rick,Serious is a relative thing. Academically, messing with the Michlet and now I'm looking into some CFD... is really because I'm interesting in those things anyway. I like trying to apply them to a real world project. So, I'm going to shoot for 30, but I'm not really expecting it and if it never happens, I'll not be disappointed. If someone ribbs me for it, it won't hurt. My expectations are closer to 20... but if you design for a Ferrari, you're more likely to get it than if you design for a Jeep.BTW, what are you using... to get those numbers? (NACA0010, cavitate at 3 degrees at 30 kts). Its probably pretty obvious, that I haven't done a complete analysis top to bottom on every component. Frankly, the decoupled nature of the beast has made me lazy (if not cocky). The lee hull is "in production" so its about the only thing fixed in the design. Its pretty much relying on length and minimum wetted surface with a slightly flatter bottom... with the hope (not analyzed or expected) of getting it planing. Anything after that... most of the rest of the boat's decisions are based on carrying the 10,000 pounds in comfort and trailerable with speed third. Just having fun.Dennis