Subject: Re: [harryproa] New containerizable design, foldable, trailerable, asymmetric rudders
From: Gardner Pomper
Date: 11/14/2010, 8:22 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

I haven't got the mechanism exactly sorted out, but it seems like there is probably bungee chord involved somehow <grin>. The idea is to make it automatic, so the helmsman doesn't even have to think about the rudders; they will just automatically cant. If anyone has ideas on exactly how to do that, I am all ears.


My other concern about this layout is cost. The last one I put up uses a ballestron rig, which is my preference for ease of sail handling, but it required the boom to be raised up to go over the cockpit, and that meant the mast would not fit in a 40' container, so had come apart into multiple sections. Do you have any feeling about the relative pricing between 2 40' wingmasts, with just a boom, vs a 2 part wingmast with a boom and a jib boom? I assume that 2 masts is more than 1 mast, but they are simpler.

Another area which I have made more complicated is adding bearings to rotate the beams around the masts, but I have made the lw hull smaller and lighter. Cost-wise, do you think I have increased my costs, or would you expect them to be about the same?

I know that asking about prices before the actual design is done is the cardinal no-no in boat design (or any design), but I don't want to make expensive conveniences ruin my inexpensive test boat.

- Gardner

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Looks good, should work.  The rudders will be good if the connection etc is less hassle than rotating them 360 degrees.  As they have to rotate anyway, it will need to be a very simple connection.

rob



On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:48 AM, gardner.pomper <gardner@networknow.org> wrote:
 

Hi all,

I haven't pestered people with a new design in a while, so I thought it was about time. I have drawings in Gardner's Layouts/Contrarry Schooner.

The idea of this one is a boat that will fold easily on the water. For that, I am using the idea of a schooner rig with the beams on bearings directly on the mast. This lets me have a really minimal lw hull, with only 2' of bury for the masts, which means that the lw hull can be made from a single 40' x 8' panel, with rob's folding technique.

I am also trying to combine Rob's beam mounted rudders, with Todd's asymettrical rudders. I am doing this by mounting the rudders to bearings mounted on each beam. In addition to kicking up when the rudder hits something, the idea is that the rudders will cant backwards so that they will be balanced in each direction. I would do this by letting the bearing rotate freely for a 60 degree range (+/- 30 degrees from vertical).

I know there have been problems with the rudders not getting pushed to the correct position from the water pressure, so I would tie the rudder position to the boom position. Since the mast/beam/rudder are all close together, this should not be that hard. The key is that the rudder should be canted away from the direction of travel, and the boom is also pointed the direction the rudder should be canted in. So, there could be a mechanical linkage so that when you pull the boom around, it exerts a force on the rudder bearing so that when the boat stops for an instant during the shunt, there would be enough force for the rudder to get pulled back to the correct position.

I am showing the boat on the trailer at 12' width, because it is possible to tow it that way and the lw hull is small enough that it can be tilted to overhang the tow vehicle, just like the masts. This should help tow it like a 30-35' boat, instead of a 40' boat.

For putting the boat in a container, or for towing at 8.5' width, the cockpit can be removed from the main ww hull and all stowed in a shipping container, but it is not easy to do that.

Finally, I don't have all the weights calculated, but from the panel drawing, I don't believe this should weigh much different from a "traditional" harry. If true, then there should be plenty of sail, since the total sail area is 500+ sq ft, as opposed to Harry's 450 sq ft.

I have not done a 3D model or detailed weight calculations. I would hope to get feedback from the members here, particularly on the idears for the folding mechanism and the rudders.

Thanks alll

- Gardner
York, PA



__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___