Subject: Re: [harryproa] Wing Sections...
From: Rick Willoughby
Date: 5/17/2011, 5:08 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Dennis

The 16 series is hard to better.

You can dial in almost anything using the modified 4 digit series.

I expect you will find a cambered section does quite a bit better but then I have not compared the boat polars with the different sections; just the basic wing paramaters.

Rick
On 18/05/2011, at 5:37 AM, Dennis Cox wrote:

 

Rick,
 
Concerning the foil section of the wing for your recent design study.  In your general thoroughness, I imagine you compared to more conventional, symmetric foils to get a base line.  I'm wanting to start looking at some trade studies for a wing for MLM.  I've brushed off some old my old composite and mechanics of materials spreadsheets and started getting re-familiar with JavaFoil.  I am wondering if you have any suggestions and thoughts for foil shapes besides the basic NACA 0012? 
 
And if you have any opinions concerning the added complexity of a flap per...
... versus its benefits, I sure would dissect every word you put to electrons.
 
Thanks,
Dennis


Rick Willoughby
03 9796 2415
0419 104 821


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___