Subject: Re: [harryproa] ToyyoT Design Development
From: Rick Willoughby
Date: 5/23/2011, 8:46 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Arto

Foils in the bow do not work well.  As the bow dives they can cause the bow to dive even faster. The best place for a foil is on the aft rudder.  If the bow pitches down the aft foil digs in and the buoyancy in the middle helps lift the bow.  This is usually effective in preventing pitchpole.

A steeply angled spray rail above the waterline can be used to create lift.  However it also creates extra drag so may not prevent pitchpole.

I think the most effective way is to flare the hull sides.  This increases the area of the waterplane in the ends and hence improves longitudinal stability.  Another way is to just increase the length.  Also a  flat planing surface at the bow will give lift at higher speed where his trim is becoming a concern.

For Gardner's lw hull the bow would trim 195mm up at 20kts if it did not have to resist the sail moment.  So it is already able to provide more than half what is needed at 20kts.  

Lowering the CofE of the rig will help with trim but it knocks rig efficiency.

ToyyoT bows are already quite full with large entry angle.  However the lw hull could have more beam.   This may  be a means to increase the waterplane area in the ends.

My observations are that it is better to build the lift into the hulls rather than playing around with more add-on control surfaces.  There are cues in what you see on the amas of large modern tris.  I do not know if level trim can be achieved for ToyyoT within its length constraint - to fit in a container.

Rick

On 23/05/2011, at 10:05 PM, Arto Hakkarainen wrote:

 

Rick,
 
I have been thinking a lot about ways to affect the bow down trim seen in some tests. One thing that repeatedly comes to my mind is a lifting foil in the bow which would ideally be the bow rudder canted and locked or other better idea. What kind of forces and what kind of foil it would take to change the bow down trim to level or bow up trim?
 
Arto

--- On Mon, 5/23/11, Rick Willoughby <rickwill@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

From: Rick Willoughby <rickwill@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: [harryproa] ToyyoT Design Development
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Date: Monday, May 23, 2011, 2:44 PM

 
Gardner
I have looked more closely at the hull drag around your target 15kts.  When I adjusted the regression factors to give better approximations around 15kts the speed prediction lifts to 15.7kts in 15kts true wind.  

Some things to consider:
1.  The speed potential is above 20kts.  The trim of the main hull when at 20kts will be about 7" bow down and getting deeper with speed.  

2.  There is slight bow down trim throughout the speed range.  The smallest is 40mm bow down at 12kts.  This means that the flat bottom of the ww hull is not going to produce lift.  Even when lightly loaded it will still have a relatively high drag.   Having rocker in the ends would give it some planing surface to get it lifting rather than maintaining a lot of wetted surface.  It would also counter the bow down tendency of the lw hull. 

3. If you were game enough to press to the point of lifting the ww hull then the loads become quite large.  The mast sees a force of 10.2kN (about 1 tonne force).  The trailing rudder has a side force of 5780N (over 1/2 tonne).  (I think the bow of the lw hull digging in will make this a scary exercise as you will be doing around 25 kts)   

4.  When I was redoing the hull regressions I also looked at possibility of reducing hull drag.  For a lw hull displacing 1050kg the lowest drag hull for 15kts would be 14.7m long.  The drag would be 681N.  Imposing a length constraint of 11.5m results in a hull with drag of 700N.  At 15kts your windward hull has a drag of 740N.  So not far off the minimum.

5.  The above analysis is with non-ventilating rudders.  With ventilating rudders the speed drops from best of 15.7kts to 15.3kts in 15kts of wind.  The rudders may not ventilate when everything is in the groove as the cambered shape will be at negative AoA once moving at speed.  If you have to go to positive AoA then I expect they will be more likely to ventilate due to leading edge flow separation.  As you can see the actual speed variation is not much but the rudder control would vary. 

6.  Using a non-ventilating centreboard the best speed gets to 15.9kts.  However it has to be sized right and trimmed to get the best results.  If it is too big the front rudder ends up working against it.  The main advantage is the reduction in rudder loads down to about 25% of the load without the centreboard.

Now that I have the model set up it is quite easy to test different things.  

There is likely to be merit in playing with the lw hull shape to improve trim.    The sort of things to try are flared sides in the hull, rocker in the ends and flat lifting surfaces in the bows.  The latter might not show up in my displacement mode analysis but at higher speed you will get dynamic lift.

Rick Willoughby



Rick Willoughby
03 9796 2415
0419 104 821


__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___