Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Wind vane vs compass self steering |
From: Michael Fischer |
Date: 7/20/2011, 8:57 AM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
what usually goes wrong with electronic pilots? the mechanical part or the electronics?
seems there is a lot of 'gear' on the windvanes - no?
Actually servopendulum seems like the correct term. See the principle explained here: http://www.selfsteer.com/products/monitor/servopendulum.phpThe idea is that the windvane turns the servopendulum and the force of the waterflow tilts the servopendulum that is connected to the rudder and turns the boat back to its course.ArtoFrom: Michael Fischer <mifi601@gmail.com>Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Wind vane vs compass self steering
I think we should define 'servo'
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Arto Hakkarainen <ahakkara@yahoo.com> wrote:
The servovane needs to be trailing the boat or at least shunted to the new tack. Without servovane the self steering by windvane is not powerful enough.ArtoSent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:55 PM
Subject: [harryproa] Re: Wind vane vs compass self steering
would it not work to put in on the ww hull?
ben
> Also how do you setup the windvane and servovane to the proa? It should be at the back of the boat but what do you do after the shunt?