Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: under over buoyant or weight
From: Paul Wilson
Date: 9/19/2011, 4:37 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

I think with less than 100% volume, you would drive the hull under and eventually flip.  See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QP-67_sPgGc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPEcZR_PvWo

I believe Sodebo and Idec (sisterships) are approximately 200% volume on the outrigger.  They show that even with such a high volume and surface piercing hulls, they can still get driven under the waves.     Idec recently flipped on a transatlantic record attempt. 

Cheers, Paul

On 20/09/2011 5:19 a.m., bjarthur123 wrote:

 

rob-

what is your design criterion for volume of the lw hull? i assume it is substantially more than 100% displacement of the whole boat.

i ask because i wonder whether it might be beneficial to have it <=100%, so that one could never fly the ww hull. impossible to flip sideways then, and a good indicator of when you're pushing it too hard.

weta floats work like this. <100% and wave piercing. surprising how difficult it is to flip them, though it does happen.

ben

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:
> BD's lee hull is huge compared to any trimaran lee hull, and plenty big
> enough for the immersions it sees.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___