Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: under over buoyant or weight
From: Rob Denney
Date: 9/19/2011, 8:22 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

I use a number of criteria.  Mast and beam bury, hull stiffness, bow freeboard, max prismatic, min wetted and overall surface.  Very difficult to make a <100% hull with these criteria, and even if you could, I wouldn't, certainly not on an offshore boat where waves become a problem for low buoyancy hulls.  


rob

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:19 AM, bjarthur123 <bjarthur123@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

rob-

what is your design criterion for volume of the lw hull? i assume it is substantially more than 100% displacement of the whole boat.

i ask because i wonder whether it might be beneficial to have it <=100%, so that one could never fly the ww hull. impossible to flip sideways then, and a good indicator of when you're pushing it too hard.

weta floats work like this. <100% and wave piercing. surprising how difficult it is to flip them, though it does happen.

ben



--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:
> BD's lee hull is huge compared to any trimaran lee hull, and plenty big
> enough for the immersions it sees.


__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___