What do you think about the shape of the hull and having no rocker in general nowing the width? Sail mast and rudders will be placed nearer to leeward hull like on proa squared.800lbs at 4'' depth CP.701
weight of hull 250-350 +/-... Intended load carrying 900lbs for entire boat. 4oo sqft 40/60 split fractional rig on a 33' stick
Todd
--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:
>
> need a whole lot more information (payload, boat weight, sail area, use,
> hull shape, prismatic, etc etc) before I would recommend anything. But 22"
> on 32' is 17:1 l/b, so if everything else was good, it would get along
> pretty quickly.
>
> rob
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:23 AM, tsstproa <bitme1234@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > What do you think Rob, anyone? 22'' keel width to wide for a 32' hull?
> > Maybe do a 20' foot long hull with a 14''wide keel depending on how much
> > weight I decide to carry over on windward hull!?
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, "tsstproa" <bitme1234@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Another test in lump light wind. But showing some potential in a sharp
> > gust. I would build a different leehull to go along with this configuration
> > to get buoyancy correct. Looks like the no rocker flat bottom does alright.
> > But I suspect in light airs not well powered up things could be come abit
> > unpleasant. Really quick acceleration in roll and pitch. seasick for sure
> > me....
> > >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poH4XZ7ucaA
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, "tsstproa" <bitme1234@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You don't see buoyancy shift difference among the two different ama
> > forms one being square the other V. It is effecting trim of windward hull,
> > Models not balanced or sitting level. Weight on model stayed the same no
> > change.
> > > >
> > > > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Arto Hakkarainen <ahakkara@>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Moves nicely.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>