Subject: [harryproa] Re: Articulated lw hull
From: "John" <jrwells2007@googlemail.com>
Date: 9/29/2011, 6:01 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

What about two lw hulls, each with two bows and say 16' long, joined bow to bow with a Wharram type rudder lashing? Not the most smooth of hulls but usually there is non-laminar flow by midships plus many boats have lots of turbulent making bits hanging off the hull. Would be no worse than a boat with a bit of weed on the bottom? Obviously not a racing setup but adequate for mucking about and cruising?

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:
>
> I, and I suspect, many others have thought about it, but the mechanics of
> building it, and sealing the gap in both directions has always been
> insurmountable. Plus, you still need enough foil in the water to prevent
> leeway, so the added complexity does not get paid for by reduced wetted
> surface.
>
> rob

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___