Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Linked bidirectional counter rotating steering boards....
From: Gardner Pomper
Date: 11/6/2011, 4:18 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Rob,


I would like rudders that can lift up to allow a 1' draft, and still be able to lower to 4-5'. When using a "traditional" rudder with a shaft, that would mean 3-4' of shaft above the blade, which means that the beams would have to be 3-4' above the water line, which seems impractical, as well as requiring a huge amount of strength because of the moment arm. 

This is something I can see doing easily with Todd's design, because I can just have a long blade, instead of counting on a shaft that has to rotate. Plus, I can support the blade closer to the water, only limited by how often I am willing to have water hit the support strut.

Do you have a sketch or photo of a "traditional" rudder that can raise at least 1m, and controlled by a wheel, along with the usual kick up on impact, etc? I really want to be able to sail (not race) in shallow water, and have good lift in deep water.

- Gardner

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com> wrote:
 

I don't believe a  single unattended foil with the rotation axis at 50% of the chord will point straight ahead at 15 knots.  Until I see one, and the physics that explains why, I cannot agree that it is a good thing to have on a boat.  


Linked rudders solve a lot of problems, but unless they work when one is raised, are no use.  Rotating them aft is a solution, but is an extra layer of complexity.  As the rudders have to turn for steering, turning them through 180 on a shunt is no big deal, unless they are mounted on the hull or utilise wheel steering, but even here, there are simpler methods.  

regards,

Rob


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___