Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: harryproa for shallow waters
From: Rick Willoughby
Date: 9/15/2012, 6:18 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Luc

I expect a hard chine gives more lateral resistance than a circular section, asymmetric hull of comparable draft.  However neither generates lift efficiently but you should be able to make way to windward.

The asymmetric hull will have extra drag off the wind and will never generate lift as efficiently as rudders or dagger board. 

Rick
On 15/09/2012, at 6:22 PM, lucjdekeyser wrote:

 

Thank you, Rick and Robert. May I conclude that the simplest seems to just motor around with a jetted prop pod at a depth not exceeding draft and only sail in deeper waters with kick down rudder/boards. If one would want to also sail in shallow waters go for an asymmetric lee hull and steer with schooner sails.
Right?
Luc

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rick Willoughby <rickwill@...> wrote:
>
> Luc
> Low speed surface piecing props are hopelessly inefficient - maybe
> 20% if it is constrained by depth. It is better to use a smaller
> prop and enclose it in a nozzle to lift efficiency - basically a jet.
>
> In fact it is difficult to better a paddlewheel for shallow water
> operation but they would be an ugly addition to a proa.
>
> Rick
> On 09/09/2012, at 9:00 PM, LucD wrote:
>
> > While Nol was discussing how Zeilen met Visie progressed optimizing
> > Blind Date, he mentioned readying her for sailing the shallow
> > waters the Dutch coasts are famous for. I guess originally kick-up
> > rudders were meant to solve that.
> >
> > If one were to build a harryproa dedicated for waters like the
> > Wadden Sea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadden_Sea with beaching
> > capability would it make sense to consider:
> > 1. an asymmetric lee hull?
> > 2. and ww hull (also flat to lee)?
> > 3. Low aspect schooner rig (for occasional rudderless steering) ?
> > 4. As apparently these boats motor more often: Rick, you were
> > involved in a discussion on slow turning surface piercing
> > propellers in 2008. Would this application make sense to offset the
> > loss of efficiency, in your opinion?
> > 5. A double hull would not require lots of flat bottoms as a monohull
> > 6. While transitioning from beached to floating the boat can bang
> > the sea bottom without being best positioned with regard to tide
> > and wind directions - Would there be a way to hold down the boat
> > some longer on the bottom and let loose to have it float higher and
> > have more room for maneuvering?
> >
> > Luc
> >
> >
>
> Rick Willoughby
> rickwill@...
>


Rick Willoughby




__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___