Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Visionary steering loads
From: Rob Denney
Date: 11/14/2012, 7:35 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:23 PM, rob_rassy <techsmart@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
 


"Have a go, see how they work."

Rob - I'll be needing a boat to do that!

And then it would be good to have a second one to compare it with - I've
often thought a proa competition with not to many rules; would be the
way to get the evolution of proas happening. Only limit overall length
and hull materials but anything else goes


Sounds good, although I would prefer a sail area limit and anything else goes.  But even then, there are ways to make a faster boat under the rule that would not make sense without it.


What do you reckon would be a practical experimental size that would
have scale relativity to the larger 15 & 20 meter boats?


Very good question.  I have used Elementarry (7.5m/25') as a test bed and for most things it seems to work pretty well.  It is also big enough for a couple of people to take camping and can be easily traillered.  Harriette (5m/16') was too small (for an adult).  


I'd recess the Leeboard tracks into the hull, the boards themselves
above the waterline would probably create the most drag


Shape them right and this would not be too bad.  Recessing into the hull at the highest loaded area of the hull will make it heavier than necessary.

rob 


Rob Rassy

--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney <harryproa@...> wrote:
>
> Leeboards have the same efficiency pluses and minuses as side hung
rudders.
> No end plate effect from the hull, but no turbulent boundary layer
either.
> Pretty similar to daggerboards.
>
> Tracks on the lee side of the lee hull are going to be draggy, but
> otherwise no reason not to, apart from your comments and mine on
ensuring
> all possible degrees of freedom are accounted for and shunting in the
> previous post.
>
> Have a go, see how they work.
>
> regards,
>
> rob
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:02 PM, rob_rassy techsmart@...wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Are leeboards inherently inefficient or was that just the experience
> > with "U"? If they were the same foil I would think they would simply
be
> > the same as a dagger board that was surface piercing!
> >
> > My thinking was to have two boards each pivoting from the top and
pinned
> > to the hull just above DWL by a curved track that would allow one
board
> > to lift/pivot clear and the other to lower when shunting. The setup
> > would require 4 boards instead of 2 (more weight / complexity / cost
&
> > in the way for mooring) but on the up side the leeboards are against
the
> > hull so less load handling and complication issues with the mounts.
The
> > rudders could be smaller with smaller loads on the hinges and
steering.
> > The drag on the leeboards would help counter weather helm.
> >
> > Rob Rassy
> >
> > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney harryproa@ wrote:
> > >
> > > The deeper the hull and the wider the blade behind the pivot
point,
> > the
> > > more of a consideration it is. Steering with the aft rudder on
Vis, I
> > > would not like it any closer than it is.
> > >
> > > I tried leeboards on U, with out much success. They see loads
> > (rotating
> > > forward, floating to leeward) which are not what you expect, so
need a
> > lot
> > > of lines to hold them in place. The lower the boat performance,
the
> > > better they work. Any foil fixed fore and aft is going to make
> > shunting
> > > harder.
> > >
> > > rob
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:02 AM, rob_rassy techsmart@...:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How close can the rudder be to the hull? Is wave action between
the
> > > > rudder and hull a consideration or does the rudder only need to
have
> > > > enough clearance to operate with out hitting the hull?
> > > >
> > > > I've also been thinking about lee boards on the actual lee side
of
> > the
> > > > lee hull and was wondering if they have been tested on a
harryproa?
> > > >
> > > > --- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Rob Denney harryproa@
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:08 AM, rob_rassy techsmart@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rob I do have more questions, but don't encourage me too
much
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The more the merrier!
> > > > >
> > > > > > ****
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm still confused how the foils can be liftable. When you
say
> > > > "centre of
> > > > > > rotation is mid chord" do you mean the actual pivot point is
mid
> > > > foil
> > > > > > thickness as well? (ie: The hinges will be recessed into the
> > foil)
> > > > or
> > > > > > are the pivots mid distance along the chord and mounted
outside
> > the
> > > > foil. I
> > > > > > realise the foil will have less camber on the lee/hinge
side,
> > but
> > > > unless it
> > > > > > is negative the chord will lie inside the foil (won't it -
> > correct
> > > > me if
> > > > > > I'm wrong).
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The foil slides in a case. On the hull side of the case is a
> > > > > gudgeon/pintle arrangement. Means increasing steering loads as
the
> > > > > rudders are turned, exacerbated if the blades are not swept
back
> > > > and/or
> > > > > connected. If the loads are too high, the rudders will kick
up.
> > The
> > > > > gudgeons/pintles are mounted on a substantial shaft to allow
this
> > to
> > > > > happen.
> > > > >
> > > > > > ****
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My thought was to cant the rudder (tilt the bottom towards
> > "under"
> > > > the lee
> > > > > > hull) to put the offset pivot point mid way on the
longitudinal
> > (Top
> > > > to
> > > > > > Bottom) of the rudder, the cant angle would be quite small
to
> > > > achieve this
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > True. Definitely worth a try if the current setup doesn't
work.
> > > > although
> > > > > the top will have to be firther away from the hull so that the
> > blade
> > > > can
> > > > > rotate through 30 degrees each way without hitting the hull.
> > > > >
> > > > > > ****
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I reckon you might be right about the Blind Date crew
wrestling
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > rudders, if the direction of travel hadn't changed and the
> > rudders
> > > > turned
> > > > > > it would be difficult if not impossible to force them round.
> > > > > >
> > > > > One of those things that comes with practice. BD crew in the
> > videos
> > > > are
> > > > > first timers and apart from the helmsman and photographer, non
> > > > sailors.
> > > > > Interesting to compare them with first timers tacking or
gybing a
> > 15m
> > > > cat
> > > > > or mono, particularly one with an overlapping headsail.
> > > > >
> > > > > rob
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___