Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: asymmetric spinnaker
From: Rob Denney
Date: 12/3/2012, 2:17 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Ben,

Probably should have put a smiley face after the SA/SD numbers as their definitions don't seem to apply.  

Dead down wind, a conventional sloop rig with spinnaker is not using the jib or the part of the spinnaker that is behind the main.  And with a 3 stay rig, the main is not doing that much either.  This is one of the reasons many cat cruisers drop their mains down wind and just use the spi.      

A rig where the sails can be placed at 90 degrees to the wind will use all the sail area.  Although, even if you had colossal down wind sail area, you are unlikely to go at more than 50% of the wind speed, so huge spinnakers are not that much help.  

The extra sail area downwind/reefed upwind applies best to a telescoping rig, although extra height on an unstayed mast is not as much extra weight or windage as on a stayed rig.  

All that aside, downwind extras are a good idea if you want to go faster and don't mind the added hassle and cost.  Tacking the headsail to the beam is the same aerodynamically as the ballestron jib when the rig is eased, so no problem.  Go for it.

I am a keen follower of the Wylie cats, although it is very hard to get any credible information on them.  Where did you get the  "they are pigs downwind" information from, please? 

Thanks for the heads up on Boat Design forum.

Gardner,
Solitarry fits in a container.  The hull ends are removable, the windward hull is less than 8' x8' and the mast is either telescoping or two piece.  I have not checked out deck cargo prices, but they are much higher as the assembled  boat takes up 2 container spaces lengthwise and 4 sideways.  Breaking it down would take less space, but be much harder/more expensive to secure, load and unload.  

Questions, thoughts and suggetstions are always welcome.  

The booms are high in the drawings, won't be in reality.  As long as they can swing through 360 degrees, they can be as low as you like.  Lw hull is 1.9m/6'3" for headroom.

The aft rudder, when lifted more than 900mm/3', will hit the beam if you run aground.  Draft at this stage is 300mm/16".  Much less than this and the rudder will not be doing much steering or leeway resisting, so may as well pull it all the way up.  Or slow down to a more sensible speed.  ;-)

The windward hull layout can be whatever you want.  I took the Vis Cruiser space and put a table and upstairs galley into it.  If you did not want to walk on the deck from end to end of the windward hull, (and I doubt anyone does), then extending the saloon to windward and making a huge galley is doable.  Probably reduce the width of the saloon accordingly. Ken will be building the shell, then seeing how everything fits inside it.  Suspect there will be a lot of mocking up before a final decision is made.

Arto,
Yuk.  30C here at midday, surfing before breakfast most days.

rob

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM, bjarthur123 <bjarthur123@yahoo.com> wrote:
 



my concern is not so much with SA/D, but rather having a sail plan which is suited to the drastically different needs of upwind vs downwind points of sail.

for any given true wind, the apparent wind is lighter going downwind. (don't mean to be pedantic here, just want to be explicit.) so you want more sail area then to compensate.

furthermore, the sail's drag points aft when close-hauled, is hence bad, and so L/D should be optimized in sail shape. whereas going downwind the drag points sideways (broad reach) or even forward (running), so is less of a concern (and even good), and sail shape should hence optimize for just L.

both these points argue for having a specialized sail which is deployed for downwind work. a spinnaker! double your sail area for the lighter apparent; a deep camber to maximize lift. combined with the great L/D of a unarig, instead of a ballestron, and you'd have an adjustable sailplan optimized for all conditions.

rob suggested just having a bigger mainsail and reefing it appropriately upwind. simpler, yes, but a lot more weight aloft. awhile back he also mentioned a junk-rig like way of adjusting the camber. that'd be way cool, but is yet untested to my knowledge. spinnakers on the other hand have a long history and have been very refined by the racers.

the wyliecat has a similar rig to the harryproa. unstayed carbon mast with a unarig. by all accounts they are lightening fast upwind, keeping up with full-on race boats twice their length. and are slow as pigs downwind. by inference i think the same might be true of harryproas. sure would be nice to have more race reports from current owners.

true, the most important point of sail to design to is close-hauled. not only is going upwind less pleasant, so you want to make the boat fast in that direction to minimize the amount of time you spend there. but there is the safety in the ability to keep away from lee shores in a storm to consider. so i'm very glad that harryproas are designed with that in mind.

but if all it takes to improve downwind performance is to throw up a spinnaker, then sign me up! the vast amount of cruising is downwind, routes purposely chosen to be so. an asymmetric spinnaker, without a pole, is not that difficult. they can be doused with a furler or a sock. it's just a matter of getting the sheeting angle right and designing the beams to take the load of the tack.

ben



--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, Mike Crawford <mcrawf@...> wrote:
>
> For the sake of discussion:
>
> a) What SA/D do you think you would need for ocean passages?
>
> b) If you want a monster SA/D, would that be for very low-wind
> conditions, or for all-out racing in higher winds (with enough crew to
> handle the challenges brought on by carrying too much sail when things
> change)?
>
> Honest questions -- whatever you feel you need is what you need. I'm
> not here to tell you what you should want. Once we know the goal, then
> we can figure out how to achieve it with a combination of sails.
>
> For convenience: http://www.nuomo.com/boatSadBruceCalculator.htm
>
> - Mike


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___