Subject: RE: [harryproa] Re: rowing a vis
From: Peter Mirow
Date: 12/15/2012, 5:34 PM
To:
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Hi Fedor,

Interesting point. However, I see it from another angle: ... or maybe not quite, since I take you're advocating for the skulls.
But sseing it from the skull users, I don't think the point is the "unreliability" of the engine. 
It is rather that; the sculls won't fail, don't make noise, don't stink, won't cost, and will keep you fit - as a bonus.
To be honest, I'm surprise at the small amount of sailors who prefer engines...
Peter


To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
From: fedor.von.balluseck@philips.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:32:31 +0000
Subject: [harryproa] Re: rowing a vis

 
I am always surprised of the amount of French sailors that still depend on skulls. Many diehards still believe an engine is 'unreliable' and will sail or skull (like the junk) fairly large boats into a harbor.
2 sculling spots mid beam may be a good and simple last resort on the smaller Harrys. (It is actually quite fun once you get the hang of it).
Fedor

________________________________
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___