Subject: [harryproa] Re: Bidirectional autopilot and electronics
From: Mike Crawford
Date: 1/21/2013, 11:37 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

<<If you decide to go with one central controller for two working units you also need two sources of input for heading and possibly wind direction.>>

Arto,

  You might be right.  I actually started to write something up yesterday and then figured I'd already spent too much time on forum posts.

  But today is a federal holiday here, and none of my clients are calling me, so why not ponder the electronics.

  I'm a big fan of the Tack Tick wireless instruments.  It's just great not to have wires running everywhere, particularly on a boat that can be folded and demounted.  Plus it's neat now they just all work together.  After I connected my Tack Tick system to my NMEA bus, the instruments automatically knew the difference between true north and magnetic north based upon the GPS location.  When I added in the mast rotation sensor, they automatically subtracted out the rotation to give me true and apparent wind speeds, regardless of  how quickly I mess with the mast.  Having them be solar powered and waterproof is also a plus.

  At first I thought I'd be able to get away with just a second speed transducer because things like the fluxgate compass and depth sensor wouldn't care where the boat was pointed.  But then reality set in and I realized that while I'd get an accurate wind direction and speed even in reverse, the autopilot wouldn't be able to use that data, and the instruments themselves would be a bit confused.

  That would mean either converting to a heavy-duty autopilot that can be reprogrammed, which is expensive, heavy, and hydraulic, or sticking with the tiller pilots and either switching inputs or going with two full systems.

  Two wind sensors also wouldn't work because the system will only recognize one, and because it's wireless, you can't switch it.

  This is one of the few times that a single-ender seems attractive to me -- no worries about any of the electronics, controls, sensors, or lights.

---

  1) One thought is to put the wind meter on a separate mast, possibly on the windward hull, which will rotate through 180 degrees.  Rotating the mast on each shunt would change the wind direction and compass direction mechanically as the mast moves, as well as switch the internal connections for the speed transducer, autopilot mechanism, and nav lights.  (Did someone else suggest this a few years ago?)

  That way there's only one instrument system and the only redundancies are a second autopilot tiller mechanism (single controller), a second speed transducer, and a second set of nav lights.

  It still seems kind of complex and cumbersome, though.  Plus, the wind sensor wouldn't be of much use of sailing with the ww hull to leeward in very light winds.

  2) The other thought is just dual systems, with instruments on the aft-facing side of the cockpit visible while sitting on the forward-facing side.  Then everything just works as intended, from the mast heads, without having to remember to switch inputs on each shunt.  Nav lights could even be auto-controlled with a sensor that flips a solenoid any time you're going in "reverse" at more than 2 knots.  Or at least sounds a warning buzzer if you haven't flipped the switch. 

  But that's another $10k expenditure, give or take.  The plus side is the "simplicity" of not having to rotate a mast that itself can fall in a wind shadow, along with having redundant online replacements if anything of the instruments were to fail.  The downside is all that money for something on which we shouldn't rely on too much in the first place.

  3) So perhaps I should call it a day with a mechanical windvane.

---

  Nah. Save $100k on the boat so I can go overboard with the toys.   ;-)

  Plus the windvane, of course.

        - Mike



Arto Hakkarainen wrote:

 
If you decide to go with one central controller for two working units you also need two sources of input for heading and possibly wind direction. May be a switch for them too? Or easier to just have two of each?
 
Arto

From: Mike Crawford <mcrawf@nuomo.com>
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:23 AM
Subject: [harryproa] Re: Survey/build/feature discussion - Rudders/foils

 
  How many autopilots?  Good question. 

  One central controller with two separate mechanisms, using a simple switch to change between the two?  Just one autopilot, which might work the same in both directions if you use a Speer section and keep the tiller on the same side?  Or just get two complete systems so that you have some redundancy?

  I think any of the above could work.  Like you point out, the huge savings (when compared to buying a new or even a used F36) would cover the second autopilot.  And then you'd the extra it if you needed it.

        - Mike


Gardner Pomper wrote:
 
Mike,


AUTOPILOT. 

  As for an autopilot, I'd use a Raymarine ST-4000 tiller pilot.  The control goes inside, or at least at the cockpit, and just the mechanical portion sits out, the base connected to the leeward hull, the end connected to the tiller (not the extension).  I use one of these on my catamaran with great success.  If patched into the nmea system, you can even have it steer to GPS waypoints, or to the average wind direction of the last minute. 

So, would you just have 2 autopilots? One for each tiller? I guess that would be simplest, and somewhat affordable, since we are saving so much money on the boat <grin>. 


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___