Subject: Re: [harryproa] sloping vs flat high vs flat low
From: "Roger L" <rogerlov@ix.netcom.com>
Date: 4/30/2013, 8:57 AM
To:
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Am I the only one getting confused with all the bow parts?
 
Sometimes it seems like I'm reading about the top deck of the bow, othertimes the front (prow?) of the bow, or the angle of the bow when seen from above, and maybe it all started with the curved portion (or angled or whatever) part that cuts through the water and connects back to the bottom of the hull.. 
 
Are there nautical terms that exactly describe the different parts of a bow?
   Roger L.
...
..............
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Denney
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: [harryproa] sloping vs flat high vs flat low

No reason why the bow can't be flat, as long as it is not so low that it is likely to be submerged, at which time, rounded is better to shed the water.  For mooring bows to, I would use the boom (on a schooner) as a hand rail. 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___