Subject: [harryproa] Re: survival in heavy seas
From:
Date: 1/21/2014, 3:59 PM
To:
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Thank you, all. Mike, you may have added a chapter to Shuttleworth’s treatise.

The individual appreciation of risk is an endless discussion; and the insurance companies’ appreciation does not seem to have generated a booming business for them. I consider myself warned.

I’ve long accepted the inherent safety advantages of the HP designs. But as Rick wrote:” It is a matter of identifying the risks as best as possible then designing to mitigate them and ultimately operating within those constraints.  Understanding and testing the limits are a challenge particularly on a developmental design.”  And hibernating till that development is done is not an option.

As a thought experiment in the extreme I imagine the ww hull to be a free fall lifeboat, the rig to be limited in size as to not cause a capsize when kept sheeted, up to, what, 60 knots of wind, and explosive bolts that automatically demast beyond that. There goes fast, simple and light.

I have not found much about the difference between flat vs round bottom in this respect – I suspect that the sharpness of the outside corner of the chine could be the determinant factor.

Luc

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
.

__,_._,___