Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re:: Re: unstayed mast lessons |
From: "Mike Crawford mcrawf@nuomo.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> |
Date: 2/5/2015, 9:19 AM |
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
Sorry about the confusion. I was replying to your posts on 2/2 pm
where you were pondering safety issues inherent in the basic design
of the GB vs the HP.
It would be interesting to see a gunboat with an unstayed mast
buried in one hull. I wonder how much lighter the gunboat would be
without all those compression loads at the center.
- Mike
Thank you, Mike. The lists for the HP are impressive. I was not clear in my intent though. It was more a thought experiment whereby the GB mast is changed to an unstayed mast in a "pacific" proa configuration, changing as little as possible from the other design and build choices for the GB unless absolutely necessary. Thus, no wave piercing bows; no double rudder/boards; no tramp between the beams... Such a boat would not be a HP but still have the advantages related to the type and placing of the mast. It also illustrates at the same time how much more a HP is.
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a new topic | • | Messages in this topic (10) |