Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re:: Flat Bottom Harryproa
From: "Rick Willoughby rickwill@bigpond.net.au [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 3/25/2015, 5:55 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Talador

I will assume the question is directed at me.

1 watt = 1 Newton x 1 metre/second

Watts = 800 x 4 = 3200W

1 HP = 746W

HP = 3200/746 = 4.3HP

The major loss is with the prop.  Big prop with high aspect blades rotating at low rpm is more efficient than a small prop spinning at high rpm.  A pod drive at 1200rpm is high rpm so prop will have low efficiency - maybe 65% or worse.  Then there are the electrical and mechanical losses to account for.

The 800N is for a 4 tonne proa with 18m lw hull at 4m/s; in calm sea conditions, no windage, perfectly smooth glossy hull, no in-water appendages like pods or rudders.  Basically it is what you would get in a tow test with a 4m/s tail wind. 

Rick

On 26/03/2015, at 4:33 AM, "taladorwood@yahoo.com.au [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:

Peter - "Power is a function of speed times drag.  So 800N at 4m/s (say 8kts) equates to a power input of 3200W.  At 60% efficiency that becomes 5.3kW"


I have tried to convert that to hp, but I am totally confused. A Newton = a watt so 800 N = .8kW so where does the 3200W  (4.26 hp) come from? It seems low, even the 5.3 kW seems low.

And why are you using a 60% efficiency? I thought you said the Electrical/motor system was apx. 90% efficient?

Also these figures are for the boat not each individual hull? Correct?

Thanks in advance,

Talador

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rick Willoughby <rickwill@bigpond.net.au>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (67)

.

__,_._,___