Subject: [harryproa] Re:: Retractable motors
From: "taladorwood@yahoo.com.au [harryproa]"
Date: 6/4/2015, 4:15 PM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Mike, - " I would go with a retractable motor, in a tall well, with a hull section mounted below its cavitation plate so that it presents a smooth surface when retracted. "


Definitely something to seriously consider, except that I would make the cavitation plate fit the floor and seal it off when the prop is deployed too : )

I like this solution better than the outboard in the pod, except for the flooding in the sealed hull section. I think that the prop needs to be retractable all the way above the water line.

On the other hand, a diesel and sail drive is going to be a lot simpler and more reliable, Just the permanent drag of the prop : ( is a problem.

Mike - "The key is not to just get a maneuvering thruster that will overheat in 20 minutes, but one that is designed for use as a main propulsion unit.  Some are even used in tugs, ferries, and commercial boats."

Don't forget locomotives, big trucks, etc. and the regenerative power of a generator in the water when under sail.

Here is the bottom line with electric power, lets say the hp required is 30 hp.  That is roughly 22K Watts, which requires a 30KW generator.....  and we are off to the races cost and weight wise.

Typically a cat will have two 30 hp engines.

Talador
 

__._,_.___

Posted by: taladorwood@yahoo.com.au
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (79)

.

__,_._,___