Subject: RE: : RE: [harryproa] Re:: Re: Retractable motors
From: "'Peter Southwood' peter.southwood@telkomsa.net [harryproa]"
Date: 6/6/2015, 5:03 PM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Rectangular section in plan view the ‘duct’ would be vertical sided, and the top and bottom would follow the section at the aperture. When not in use, raise the motor and the bottom plate closes and fairs the aperture. Feathering not needed.

This system does not allow for steering the motor, and reversing would just be by changing gear.

A more complicated arrangement could be made with a fully rotatable thruster in a circular nozzle, but that would be a major bit of engineering, not a simple fairing on a stock outboard motor.

 

From: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au [mailto:harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au]
Sent: 06 June 2015 03:37 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Subject: Re:: RE: [harryproa] Re:: Re: Retractable motors

 

 

Peter, - "You could consider building a low volume rectangular shaft below the waterline, with a casing around the leg that slides down inside this shaft and closes the hole when the motor is either up or down."

 

You might be onto something.  But instead of rectangular what if it was a round duct to enhance the flow? Something like the item Mike suggested?  Except that it could be sealed fairly easily.

 

The only thing though is I think a feathered prop would offer less drag when not in use.....

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5961 / Virus Database: 4355/9956 - Release Date: 06/06/15

__._,_.___

Posted by: "Peter Southwood" <peter.southwood@telkomsa.net>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (92)

.

__,_._,___