Subject: [harryproa] Re:: Greenbird wing design
From: "robriley@rocketmail.com [harryproa]"
Date: 6/27/2015, 5:21 AM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

There is no sail shape difference between a proa or normal boat, fore and aft is the same as a tack (or Gybe)  lift from one side then the other.

when the boat shunts the camber curve of a non symmetric foil is on the wrong side one way or the other

Oh you also seem to be a little confused on airfoil numbers.  The NACA 00XX are all symmetrical, the xx portion is percentage of chord at the thickest point. If there are numbers in the 00 portion then it is an asymmetrical foil.

no I understood that, for some reason when I looked it up I managed to drag up a cambered profile and was too tired to notice


Yes, but they are always angled lower than the main wing, 4˚ typically.  When I built my first airplane I reduced that angle thinking that it would improve the top end performance, it didn't and it hurt the landing speed (stall point). It is kind of bad if they both stall at the same time.......  Ask me how I know.

thats not necessarily true, in any event a low tail will likely be in the wake of the mainplane, but also the wake of the prop (single engine)

 The designers goal when it comes to the tail is to get minimum drag,  ALL the lift should come from the main wing. The tail is just there to help with pitch and yaw occasionally : )

there are lifting tails too, aircraft like Hercules may need to bear some load due to inappropriate CG balance even if it is momentarily, such as in an airdrop  Indeed the common position for most large aircraft will have tails that need to compensate for CG shifts due to their operational circumstances.
 

__._,_.___

Posted by: robriley@rocketmail.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (51)

.

__,_._,___