Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re:: Cruiser 50
From: "Rob Denney harryproa@gmail.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 10/26/2015, 1:10 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

 

Excellent. Now that is a tender. 

Agreed.  The more I think about it, the less desirable a little tender is.  We are currently working on the Mk2 version for the Cruiser 60 tender which is 7.7m long.   Some of the changes will also apply to the 6.2m on the Cruiser 50.

To stay consistent with the airy feeling of the HP60, one of its selling features, I would open up the wall to the deck as much.


Easy enough to do if opening door and the vertical sliding window aren't enough. 

I really like the design of the steps.I am not sure all wives would agree.

Also changable, although I think they would get used to them pretty quickly.  

Is the view better helming with the wheel canted inside?

About the same, but more sheltered.  
 

For another function on the Cruiser, your electronics and screens could just be swivelled around to be visible from the helm. Saves the cost and consumption of duplicate items

Good idea.

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (9)

.

__,_._,___