Subject: RE: : Re: : Re: [harryproa] Re: Cruiser 50
From: "'Jerry Barth' shredderf16@sbcglobal.net [harryproa]"
Date: 11/2/2015, 11:58 AM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Talador,

            So you’re married to Bill Lear’s daughter?  That would make you on the oldish side, or maybe you married a cougar!  You wouldn’t happen to know anything about Vipers would you (from a former Viper Driver)? Sorry all for the cryptic exchange but Talador has been a mystery from the beginning.  Unlike him I’ll sign my real name,

Jerry Barth

 

Now back to boats!

 

From: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au [mailto:harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 7:50 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Subject: Re:: Re: : Re: [harryproa] Re: Cruiser 50

 

 

Yes opening like a clamshell for downwind would work, probably fairly well.  If it wasn't for the huge penalty of cost, weight and complexity for the slowest point of sail it would probably be worth it.

 

My wife's father invented the clamshell thrust reversers for jets which is the same principle (reversed).

 

Nothing is perfect, not being able to fly a big spinnaker or Genoa is going to be a bummer when the wind is very light and variable.  Any other conditions and the wings efficiency should get the boat to the downwind goal faster.

 

Some wings have a 140 to 1 drag ratio. Perfectly trimmed mainsails at the optimum angle have a 30 to 1 drag ratio or less generally less. A sail basically has 4 times the drag, not counting shrouds and stays (which have very significant drag).

 

Talador

__._,_.___
Posted by: "Jerry Barth" <Shredderf16@sbcglobal.net>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a new topic • Messages in this topic (37)

.

__,_._,___