Subject: [harryproa] Re:: Wing Sail Benchmarks
From: "taladorwood@yahoo.com.au [harryproa]"
Date: 1/5/2016, 1:46 PM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

There are some aspects of it that I really like.  I especially like that they aren't over hyping it.


I like that the wing rotates around a fixed mast, that makes it very easy to rotate it.  They can take advantage of a much larger wind angle in relation to the boat than a sail and still be very efficient. The fixed mast means they can attach a jib to increase the area and lift, especially for downwind.

The adjustable camber means that they can get more lift from the same area than with a symmetrical wing and the wing has a larger AOA range.

What I don't like is the complexity and potential weight of the system.  It has to be 2 to 3 times heavier than a conventional sail (just in the extra sails and battens alone), weight aloft is generally a bad idea. 

I also don't like that the wing has to be controlled by a traveler and that the wing has the potential to stall, instantaneously doubling the drag and forces on the mast.

Overall though, it looks very promising to me.

__._,_.___

Posted by: taladorwood@yahoo.com.au
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (2)

.

__,_._,___