Subject: [harryproa] Re:: C60 revised drawings
From: "lucjdekeyser@telenet.be [harryproa]"
Date: 4/13/2017, 8:01 AM
To: <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 

Excellent points.

There are so many features right in this design that bringing up my comments is a bit unfair.

  •       The salon roof is more realistic but I fail to see how this can be the result of intelligent infusion without additional mold?
  •         I see no structural nor ease of building reason for not having the front face of the beams 45 degrees down to deflect waves downwards like the latest versions of the Farrier tri beams do
  •         Saloon deck clearance was lowered to prevent the step to the galley in the previous version, right?
  •         I understand why the two masts are at that distance from each other. Would there be a way to configure the sails such that one could profit from a slot effect between the two and have them approximate an articulated single wing when frontal apparent wind? Without moving the masts this would mean sails with lower aspect ratio … thus lower mast … thus lower light wind performance … ?   Moving the masts inward of course cuts up the interior volume.

__._,_.___

Posted by: lucjdekeyser@telenet.be
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (3)

.

__,_._,___