Carlos:
I'm familiar with the Duo800, but trailerablilty etc, is not
important, or even desirable in this situation. As I mentioned
before more than once, this is to be a more or less permanent live
aboard world voyaging home. Because of that, and the fact that
it will be my base of activities, an all encompassing bridge deck
cabin is preferable to the open layout with separated hulls with
walkways. Much of the area I expect to be cruising / voyaging in
has long spells of intemperate weather conditions.... weeks or
months. The more open layouts are best for fair weather sailors
and tropical sailors who venture out only in optimal conditions,
and otherwise live ashore. In a layout like Sagitta, or the KD
860, the saloon is more expansive, you do not have to go out into
the rain, wind, sleet, snow, and spray to go into the galley or
berth areas, and the areas that are walkways in the Duo or Gypsy /
Romany, etc, become extended work surfaces cupboards, etc, as well
as being occupied by the settees above, creating more useable
indoor space. The bridge deck saloon is not a stand up
area...... and that's no problem. The KD 860 is designed with 3
companionways from the saloon to the cockpit, all with sliders,
allowing things to be opened up greatly in nice weather. If there
is one thing I would spend money on, it's an abundance of good
quality large sea hatches and opening ports. Anything to be able
to open things up when in tropical climes. The optimal design
for would be a slightly stretched version of the KD 860, with the
bridgedeck cabin altered. The saloon moved forward and
lengthened, and the forward transverse berth area eliminated, the
berth areas being moved to the stern of the hulls like Sagitta,
and the cockpit area enlarged (lengthened).
I'm intrigued by the idea of the single mast in one hull as
on the HP, as it eliminates some of the structural problems while
maintaining the simplicity of a single rig. One of the main
reasons for the junk rig is the utter simplicity of sailing it,
and minimal hardware to buy, to maintain, and to fail when it's
most inconvenient. You don't need good convenient forward access
if you don't have to go forward, and with a well designed junk rig
there is no reason to ever leave the cockpit unless you want to.
Blondie Hassler sailed the Atlantic in Jester in 48 days, winning
second place in the first Ostar translantic race in 1960, never
leaving the safety of the cabin, just using a round hatch with a
pram hood to manage the sail. He sailed under his newly invented
self steering gear, the father of all windvane steering systems
today, with a flat junk rig. While that doesn't sound
impressive, Jester was a Nordic Folkboat, with a waterline length
of 19+ feet and an LOA of 25'. It came in second to Francis
Chichester in Gypsy Moth III, a 40 footer. It was sailed
AGAINST THE PREVAILING WINDS.... in other words east to west.
Blondie claimed to have sailed the course in bedroom slippers.
I hope to make numerous long open sea passages that could
extend for a month or more....... For example look at the distance
involved in sailing from Capetown to the Caribbean. On many of
these sorts of passages, one would spend a great deal of one's
time out in the cockpit, but being able to take refuge indoors and
be productive instead of just hibernating like a bear is
important. Time hangs heavy on one's hands if you cannot be
productive.... at least it does for me. The port area opposite
the galley will be a shop area primarily, where I can do boat
maintenance projects and other things. The motion of a multihull
makes it possible to be far more productive than on a monohull.
The bridge deck cabin will be for indoor lounging, reading,
navigating & communications, eating, sleeping, and keeping an
indoor watch, when being out in the cockpit is not desirable.
When at anchor, my normal inclination of living from a house
rather than in one, will inevitably come into play. The boat will
be a place to shit, shower, and shave.... and cook meals. There
is no point in going to exotic places and hanging out on your boat
looking at the shore ;-) For me a bicycle is of more importance
than a lifeboat! I'll have a distinctively ugly tender capable
of sailing... If it has an outboard at all, it will be an
electric. Like everything else I don't want to hang a sign out
that says steal this dinghy, or rob this boat.
I've looked at a lot of boats, and a 30' cat is about the most
compact package that will serve me. I like many of Rob's
innovations, actually quite brilliant, and hope to incorporate
some of his ideas, though the HP just won't do it for me without
being far larger than I want. I may end up using the biplane rig
for structural reasons. If I do, I'll design for it, but begin
with a single taller mast, probably in the port hull and see how
it works out. The fore and aft kick up retractable rudders
appeal to me strongly.... I've mentioned why before. A more
desirable alternative than daggers. The CLR needs to go
forward, in addition being able to turn one rudder port and one
starboard should double the rate of rotation, enhancing tacking.
I'm neither stubborn, nor closed minded, as Rob can attest,
and I've arrived at the basic design I want through a process that
has not been casual or careless, and goes back a long way.
Kohler, Woods, Simpson, and Kelsall have all offered boats that
come close to the mark. Sagitta, probably best fulfilling my
criteria in many ways, though I prefer the simplicity of Kohler's
hull construction, payload, and flat bottoms.
H.W.
On 06/17/2018 08:56 AM,
carlosproacarlos@yahoo.com [harryproa]
wrote: