Doug:
The reality is that plywood is an excellent boat building
material with a superb strength to weight ratio compared to the
solid glass boats.... but needs to be done right, as does
anything. Foam sandwich is a difficult and expensive method for
home building most boat shapes. Few designers, probably actually
none, have taken the effort to design boats that can be built
easily and simply with foam infusion. The typical home built
foam core boat is going to be built of strips and planks and
sheets, on or in a temporary form, sanded, and glassed on one
side, then removed and sanded and glassed and finished on the
other side. Commercially built foam core boats are in my opinion
poorly made due to the inability to guarantee a strong reliable
bond on the "blind side" in the female mold. Unlike Rob's
infusions where an even pressure or as much as 14 psi is applied
and the resin flows through the entire layup in a controlled
manner, a bonding paste is used in an attempt to achieve a good
bond between the foam and the glass, where the glass skin is
already set up.... and of course it's polyester fiberglass, not
epoxy. I consider it a poor and unreliable process that
sacrifices strength and reliability for a pretty finished skin out
of a female mold.... Worse yet is end grain balsa under the
waterline in combination with polyester glass. Currently there
is a large cat listed for sale for next to nothing due to large
expanses of rotted balsa core. On the other hand there are
plywood boats that are as much as 50 years old that are still
quite sound...... good construction and good maintenance. They
are inherently lighter and stronger than their solid glass
cousins.
Realistically Rob's intelligent infusion process applies ONLY
to a very few designs engineered for it. If you want to use
intelligent infusion, you build an HP, and if you build an HP,
it's foolish to use any other construction method.
As for myself, I may be able to use some of the methods Rob
has pioneered, and gain some advantage from his innovations, but
those possibilities are greatly limited by my choice of boat
designs. My particular set of parameters automatically exclude
the HPs much as I admire Robs work. Those parameters are specific
to me, and only me, and they are not subject to change. They
impose a penalty in labor / build time, and I accept that
penalty. If I find the product inferior or disappointing.... as
Rob suggests, he's welcome to say "I told you so"..... though I
doubt that he's the sort of man who would.
H.W.
On 09/07/2018 06:59 AM,
doha720@yahoo.co.uk [harryproa] wrote:
My own experience was that it (boat building/hany work)
was something i had not done before and found it
rewarding. Would recommend it if haven't tried making
something yourself before. Dinghy or kayak seem most
useful ans simple to do.
For this ply is ideal. So ply is still the best for some
things.
So naturally its going to cross your mind when wondering
how you might do an HP, unless you can make decisions
quickly and certainly, then possibly you would not even
consider it.
I think it may be used by someone if its a small enough
HP, and they are not trying for excessive quality and have
all the gear and materials ready set up to do it without
extra effort. Definitely a market place there. Always be
people going to throw a quick ply version together.
Just to much of a big step for some people to have to
change to a new material and learn it and do it. Unless
they have the goal of lightweight, high speed etc, then
they just may not care one way or the other.
Doug