Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re:: polyisocyanurate
From: "Rob Denney harryproa@gmail.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 12/3/2018, 6:05 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:00 AM '.' eruttan@yahoo.com [harryproa] <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:
 



| > Rob; it would seem tow through the holes would adds a lot to skin to skin adhesion, right? To the point that foam skin interface might not matter at all/do not need to worry about it?
| >
| If the skin laminate was thick enough not to leak, which would be at least 2 x 600 gsm, which is the base laminate for a C60.

Ah, so your feeling it is water under the laminate that is the issue, not the physical adhesion of the two? Or am I misunderstanding?

Adhesion would be fine, the hull skin would not, unless the skin was thick enough.  


| And the tow was at 45 degrees to the skins in both directions. So, probably not.

Why would the two need to be in both axis to have better skin adhesion?

No.  It is necessary to get the core properties in all directions.  Even better would be to include the tow at +/-45 to fore and aft.  

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (76)

SPONSORED LINKS
.

__,_._,___