Subject: Re: : Re: [harryproa] Re:: Transportable
From: "Rob Denney harryproa@gmail.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 4/14/2019, 9:35 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:07 PM doha720@yahoo.co.uk [harryproa] <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:
 

So, just thinking about a folding beam "a la" Farrier, and was supposing the beam could be changed around with curves, some slope (from the horizontal) and a higher above waterline meeting point at the lw hull.
Hence you could fold more of the overall beam. If it has to reduce from a 5m beam in sailing mode, then you would want 2m or more folded up.
This would mean the beam isn't\' horizontal and that doesn't matter much as it can be at an angle to the other parts like deck, cockpit and ww hull.

This was reminding me that I thought that it would actually be more comfortable to have your seats and cockpit angled down to windward. It is more secure feeling when sitting and sailing to be resting against the heel of the boat.
Agreed.  
Certainly don't want to be slipping off the seat down to lee as you start sailing.
Foot rests are another option.
I reckon the seats should be angled to counter expected heel plus some extra as well rather than just be level when boat heels.
Obviously the heel won't be much on bigger cruiser, but could be significant enough on smaller ones.

Also how about canting the hullsslightly so that the bottom panels will be level after some few degrees of heel.
5 degrees? Too much?
Can do, but it adds to the build effort for not much gain unless you are going to be sailing with the hull flying most of the time.  ie a race version.  The masts need to be vertical or angled to leeward for light winds, vertical or angled to windward for strong winds.  

Doug

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (26)

SPONSORED LINKS
.

__,_._,___