Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: Hull lengths |
From: "Rick Willoughby rickwill@bigpond.net.au [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> |
Date: 8/13/2019, 7:31 PM |
To: "harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> |
Reply-to: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au |
If you want slow, comfortable, roomy, good load carrying and capable of taking a battering in almost any conditions then take a look at some young second hand monos in the 10 to 12m range. There appears to be a lot of these on the market as older baby boomers lose interest in sailing often due to wife and family no longer having interest in sailing. Older baby boomers are in mid 70s. They would have needed to look after themselves to be capable of handling a comfortable cruising yacht at that age.
On 14 Aug 2019, at 4:19 am, StoneTool owly@ttc-cmc.net [harryproa] <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:Thanks for the responses......... Performance is great, however my interest is in long term voyaging, not weekending and vacation trips from a shore base with an occasional longer crossing as seems to be more typical. Payload matters, not because I need a lot of conveniences of home, but because supplies, spares, and tools add up far faster than most folks seem to realize, and I believe they fail to count many items. Including just crew weight including clothing and shoes, bedding, and other personal items, dinghy, ground tackle, and many things one might consider part of the boat because they have been "permanently installed". looking at one multihull designed for 4 people, the difference between design empty displacement and waterline displacement was only 1500 lbs. With 4 crew members, and their personal items, 1200 lbs seems a safe bet.... bodies, clothing, foul weather gear, safety gear, etc. That leaves 300 lbs for everything else, including food and water! Many of the older factory builts simply do not have readily available published figures. The result is that most multihulls are I suspect overloaded most of the time. The larger "condocats" are so loaded up with convenience junk, that the payload for the size of the boat is pathetic.My seeming obsession with payload is automatically translated by some folks into a desire to carry lots of conveniences, entertainment systems and junk. The truth is actually the opposite, I am inclined toward the spartan. What I DO care about is the ability to carry a reasonable complement of tools and spares to the extent that I can effect repairs and maintenance under most circumstances both at sea an in some remote ill equipped port. When living aboard long term while voyaging, safety, reliability, comfort, low upkeep, etc, would seem to be more important that performance in most circumstances, the exceptions being dodging weather and major storms, and making coastal day hops that are right on the edge between being a day sail or and overnighter. The latter is especially relevant when sailing solo in coastal traffic areas.It seems that multihull designers either focus on performance, or on floating condos... the exception of course is Wharram designs that do not seem to excel at anything other than having lots of deck space.
H.W
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a new topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |