Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: 12' wide folding maxi-trailerable
From: "Rob Denney harryproa@gmail.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 9/28/2019, 8:36 PM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 4:38 AM '.' eruttan@yahoo.com [harryproa] <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:
 

These are getting long. Sorry.

No need to apologise, it is a great discussion.  Maybe delete the points from emails once they are answered/resolved?

| There are several sources of cheap/free labour, I am talking to a crowd who aim to replace diesel gen sets with solar power for remote villages about the cargo ferry being a floating sales base and sundry potential sponsors and materials suppliers.

Sounds like a party boat! You go Rob!
Are you offering destination build classes for wanna be HP builders?

Not sure what I am offering at the moment, in particular whether selling shares in the boat is a better way of raising money than asking for donations and what i the best vehicle for both.  Feel free to comment, maybe on a new thread.  Regardless,  anyone who wanted to help would be welcome.  This does not just apply to the building and sailing, there is promotion, management,  fund raising/sponsorship and a bunch of other stuff to be done, plus anything I haven't figured out yet.


| > | > Honestly, that's very sexy. Closed, light, and very simple.
| > | >
| > | > Does this even need internal lines? Can they not all just be external?
| > | > Address's the maintenance. Show off how stupid simple it is?
| > | >
| > | No problem with external. They could also be removable, with a pin through the straps to keep them in place.

Now that I have had a minute to think about the beams, I ask, given tube ON tube, tube IN tube, or swing, or something else, what is your recommendation? And why?

Tube on tube for everything except looks.  Then tube in tube.  Simplest, lowest cost, easiest to build, maintain and fix.    I am a simple person (and a tight arse).  


Same question for internal/external lines in the above.

Inside telescoping means one set of inside lines, one set outside.  


Probably very easy to make inspection holes for critical points to check/repair the things for internal lines for either system?

Not really. The beams are small and highly loaded.  Holes big enough to work through would probably be too big.  


| > The straps are the glass that wraps both beams and guides them/keeps them tight?

| Yes

| > You mean the straps are removable, right?

| only by sliding them off the ends of the beams. The pins are to lock the beams and prevent the main sheet and waves pushing the hulls together.

| > And we need the straps removable so the beams tips can bury deep when the hulls are compacted? So we can leave the straps on the beams?

| The straps slide along the beams. The beam ends are tapered so the straps are loose when not fully extended.

Of course. I see it now.

| > On the ww hull assume lee beam is on the deck?

| Structurally better if the lee hull has the beam on the deck. Lee beam does not get lowered, ww one gets raised.

Makes sense. Put the hole(s) in the lighter stressed hull. I am a little slow.

| > But, if top to bottom, lee, middle, ww, is the ww beam kinda low?

| Probably. Depends on the cabin arrangement and what compromises are permitted. If the lee hull beam was at normal height, and the others stacked on top of each other, the limit is the height of the ww hull.

If it's just two beams, and we raising the cabin floor, the ww hull/ cabin roof has to raise anyway, right?

| > Is it worth it to add a 3rd beam for the extra width?
| >
| If the rig and lee hull can be shortened for traillering/marinas, the deck layout and tender organised and the strapping made easy, it would be worth a look.

We get ~22' with two beams? Is that enough for a ~44' HP?

yes

Why fight for a 3rd?

I wouldn't.


But, here is the fight...

Rig;
Masts can only be ~50’, IF you let them extend over the tow vehicle and flag them. But that might violate Mikes tree scrape limit. How long would we want/need?

Rob, I think we had a question about if it is better to have stub masts you put a mast on, or holes. The idea being stubs allow the mast to be shorter... If sitting on a trailer, the stub masts could be as high as 13' from the ground. Assuming a 36" flat bed trailer, that could be 10' hull to stub top, I think.
Your thoughts?

2 piece masts are simple to build, handle, assemble and take apart.  Stub masts have the same drawbacks as internal bearing beams, plus they are heavier than 2 piece, although the extra weight is lower.  Getting a mast onto a 10' high stub would be a challenge.  Mast raising should be easy with a gin pole.  


Lee hull shortening (removable bows) makes sense. If you shorten it to the length of the ww hull, what do we do? Flip up was the EX40F choice. Go with that?

It is easiest and safest.  Either bolts to hold the ends down or a block and tackle so it can be done remotely (my preference).


Deck layout;
We got the toy box and the cabin boxes. Looking at the EX40F, collapsed, I don't see many places for things.

If you want a lot of things, and light, cheap and fast, you will need a bigger boat.

Perhaps boxs on the ww beams if we do tube in tube. Else the straps need to slide on them, so you cant put them there while you transform.
We talked about putting them on the marina arm, which if we transform right there, is easy. But there is the 'boxes on the marina arm' for a socially unacceptable time period problem, perhaps. I know nothing about marinas.
Only thought I have, assuming beam mount won't work, is socket them into the tender before putting it under the cabin. Make the tender able to fit them?
Your thoughts?

Lifting boxes full of things (esp the anchor and chain) is not trivial.  


Tender;
If the cabin floor is raised and the tender fit under it, and anti fouled, then we solve marinaing and trailering.
Well, as much as talking about it solves anything.
Your thoughts?

Has potential.  Would need to look at the dimensions.  Maybe smaller boxes rather than full length.  


| The tender goes under the cabin overhang. Say 3' of each hull width, 6' of overhang and 6' wide tender.

I think that's the only option if hang it off the aft beam is unviable. Which it probably is as it exceeds Mikes tree scrape length, I think.
Perhaps I should ask how much length would it add Rob?

The beams are at about 30 and 70% of the length, so off the back beam would be near enough the length of the boat, so folding up the end of the lee hull would not help.


| > Can we just use the loosened ratchet straps in place of the glass straps for the in-out too?
| >
| Possibly, but there are smoother options.

I am all ears.

Can't remember what I was thinking of!  Sorry, will let you know when it comes back.


| > Perhaps the glass strap becomes a ratchet strap with glass and UHMW
| > sliders/guides/flat force spreaders under the web?
| > Loose it's a guide, clamps tight for squeak free sailing?
| > Is that reasonable?
| >
| Could be. If the beams are unloaded (someone/something sitting on the boom to lee), then in/out is pretty simple and low loads. If not, the straps need to be rigid.

Hang a weight from the boom for single handed transformations?

Yes.  Does not need to be much and can be fine tuned with the mainsheet.


| > Perhaps the 3 configurations have a lot in common?
| >
| Sure do. Complexity, frustration, cost. ;-) But given the advantages, it would be worth having a shot.

30 seconds on a string seems better than demountable beams?

Absolutely.  But demountable is quicker, cheaper and lighter to build and gives more storage/trailer options.  Easy enough to have both.


Tender under the cabin works for trailering. In the AIR40, you had the tender at the side. What was the plan for it when trailered or containered?

On the ww hull deck, I think.  Otherwise, wherever it could be squeezed in.  The Air40 is/was a WIP, we did not get very deeply into it.


| > Summary is: strap boxes to tender and hang tender off aft beam when marina/trailering. Can motor with tender.
| >
| > Thoughts?
| >
| That works, but a bit of mucking about loading and unloading. The ability to motor when telescoped is only a necessity if the in/out is difficult.
| One string on a winch for 30 seconds, plus pins or ratchet straps at your leisure would be less hassle. The toy box sliding over the cut away lee hull is better than removing it.

Walk me through this. I motor to my assigned slip in a busy marina in all my HP glory, get to the spot, tie off for a quick min, pull a transformers (10 min) and walk the boat into the hole, right?

Yeah.  Assuming all the systems are properly set up and work.


If that works, it minimizes sailing time collapsed, which had me worried a bit over stability.

It also works for the boat launch. Can be on trailer and gone fast, if busy, and finish in the parking lot/elsewhere?

Yes


Re: the toy box;
Can you get the cabin seat, walkway, and toybox in the 3' lee hull?

Not unless they are in 2' wide pieces and less than 5' long.

If you can remove the toybox, you don't have to notch the lee hull. So more interior VOLUME, as Bob says, in the lee hull.

Yeah, but it is not good for much apart from storage and you would not fill it with stored stuff.  


Can probably socket the toybox and cabin seats in 6' tender?
Your thoughts?

Only if they fit. Toybox is the length between the beams.  


Can one drop the sails into the cabin seats boxes for trailering? Or is there a better place to store them when folded?

Sails take longer to store and unstore than mast raising/lowering.  Lots of options, but a big boom bag is best.  Drop them, zip up the bag, job done.  Hooking slides into the mast track or feeding a bolt rope are both slow and fiddly.   This is one of the reasons for laced on sails.  On a trailer boat, the lacings would slide off the bottom of the mast as it was lifted out and over them when it was stepped, although I have not thought through the exact mechanism for this yet.  

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (34)

.

__,_._,___