Subject: Re: [harryproa] Re: 12' wide folding maxi-trailerable
From: "'.' eruttan@yahoo.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 9/30/2019, 7:11 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



| Tube on tube for everything except looks.

So call it sold on tube on tube. Or box on box. With straps and ratchets.

| > We get ~22' with two beams? Is that enough for a ~44' HP?

| yes

| > Why fight for a 3rd?

| I wouldn't.

>From the department of nothing is ever settled...
Noting this;
| The beams are at about 30 and 70% of the length,

What are the rudder % lengths?
What was the LOA of the EX40F folded?

I ask because the folding beams, to my mind limited the folded/trailerable length of the boat. For every bit of length you add, you add ~40%? to the length. It's kind of a hang over length, but still.

With tubes, you don't

Rob, how long could one practically make a 12' foldable? And what would it's trailering length be? Assuming our 3' hull width.

Side question on tube overlap. You mentioned 10%. Assuming our 3' hulls and 6' cabin, what is the length of our tubes in that scenario? Do we measure from where they exit the hulls to their tips, or its total length?

__._,_.___

Posted by: "." <eruttan@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (35)

.

__,_._,___