Subject: Re: : Re: [harryproa] competing with trimarans
From: "Rob Denney harryproa@gmail.com [harryproa]" <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au>
Date: 11/5/2019, 1:40 AM
To: harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au
Reply-to:
harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au

 



On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:37 AM '.' eruttan@yahoo.com [harryproa] <harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:
| If I want to sail within three months of ordering a tried and tested trailerable pretty fast boat that keeps its resale value then the Dragonfly makes sense.


That's interesting. I wonder if Rob could add a built for you price and build timeline, in addition to the plans materials and time budget, for a ready for pickup in AU version of his designs?

Rob, is that possible? Are you interested running such numbers for the Ex40?
But luc wants trailerable, so, the Ex40F? Can you do it for 93k€?

It is hard to compete with the level of finish out of  shiny moulds vs  non shiny ones.  However, 93K Euros is a lot of money.  I would be disappointed if an Ex40 cost this much.  Any competent builder would be able to give a quote once he had seen the plans.


Resale is a game. I cannot find the post discussing a price comparison by Rob, suggesting that one could throw the boat away after, and it's still cheaper. But, perhaps, not in this case.

It is with the Cruisers vs the carbon production cats of the same length.  As the boats get smaller, so does the differential.  Once the Peru C60 is completed, we will know the savings.

 Bucklist would have made a great trailer sailor, if you dont mind putting parts together. I imagine cheaper than the Tri options. Rob said 40AU built and ready to sail, IIRC.

Seems low, I can;t remember the details, but it would have been building them 6 at a time.  

__._,_.___

Posted by: Rob Denney <harryproa@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (6)

.

__,_._,___